Do you think this which player is the best in the nba is just biased answers?

seriously when people ask whos better kobe or lebron of course laker fans are going to say kobe and cavs fans will say lebron, this "best player" argument is invalid due to too many variables, you cant say kobes better with rings because he had better teammates he won his first 3 when lebron was still in school, what about wade is he better because he won the finals mvp WITH shaq?, why should guys like dwight howard or amare stoudemire be discriminated from these talks because their big men which dont dribble out 21 seconds of the clock every possesion, why cant melo or cp3 be considered because they play for small market teams that dont get the respect or hype that an la or cleveland would, we cant go stats because maybe lebron has to do everything statistically because the rest of the cavs are unrealiable, and we cant say hes the best because hes 6'8 with skills, what about kg hes like 7 ft and can handle the ball like a guard and play defense on every position something both golden boys cant do, i respect that both kobe and lebron are great players, but why should they be compared when there are so many variables, this GOAT or best player in the nba argument is different to our own biased difinitions, but me i feel there isnt a goat, there are great players but you cant seperate them due to variables in the argument, please your opinions try not to be biased and make a case on why there is a GOAT or best player in the league or not? happy new year btw :)